Pair check

Can B stand in for A?

Your supplier or distributor offered one part in place of another. Enter both, and XrefBase states exactly the claim it holds about that pair — and nothing stronger.

Try:1-968880-31-2141857-3 1-2141857-31-968880-3 DT04-3PDT06-3S-C015 DT04-3PDT04-6P-CE01

Verdict

SupersessionAsserts substitution

Manufacturer supersession: TE Connectivity replaced 1-968880-3 with 1-2141857-3

This is the manufacturer's statement, published in the source below — not an XrefBase assessment of your application.

Where 1-2141857-3 sits among 1-968880-3’s cross-references: Published replacements — The only results asserting a replacement relationship. Confirm application-specific fit before use.

TE E-20-012094 Description of Changes: 1-968880-3 obsolete and replaced by 1-2141857-3. (The PCN's replacement table lists the part as discontinued and leaves its Substitute Part Number column empty; the pairing is stated in the narrative.)

The reverse is not asserted: 1-968880-3 is not a replacement for 1-2141857-3. Asked the other way round, 1-968880-3 is 1-2141857-3's superseded predecessor — product history, not an alternative.

Check the other way round: 1-968880-3 in place of 1-2141857-3

A · Specified

1-968880-3

TE Connectivity · AMP MCP 2.8 · Terminals & Contacts

Part page →

B · Offered instead

1-2141857-3